The High Court of Jharkhand held that the criminal appeal abated and was disposed of because the sole appellant, Ropna Munda, died four years ago, as evidenced by a death certificate.
The criminal appeal was abated and disposed of as the sole appellant died four years ago.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Criminal Appeal (D.B.) No. 76 of 1996(R)
Ropna Munda … … Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar (Now Jharkhand) … … Respondent
CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B.B. MANGALMURTI -----For the Appellant : None For the respondent-State : A.P.P.
05/05.07.2018 Pursuant to the order dated 05.04.2018, the execution report of the bailable warrant has been received, which shows that the sole appellant Ropna Munda died four years ago. The death certificate has also be brought on record.
Since the sole appellant in this appeal has died, this appeal abates, and is disposed of as such.
( H. C. Mishra, J.)
Anit
Ropna Munda
The State of Bihar (Now Jharkhand)
H. C. Mishra
B.B. Mangalmurti
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
