The court found the petitioner's appointment invalid, closed the contempt proceeding, and granted liberty to challenge the decision.
Contempt proceedings closed; liberty granted to challenge the invalidity order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cont. Case (Civil) No. 544 of 2017
Lalita Kumari, daughter of Shree Nirmal Mishra and wife of Shyamal Mishore Jha, resident of Kumhar Toli, Jeevan Path, PO, PS and District-Hazaribagh ... ... Petitioner
Versus
... ... Opposite Parties
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHREE CHANDRASHEKHAR
For the Petitioner : Mr. Rajeev Ranjan Tiwary, Advocate For the State : Mr. Yogesh Modi, A.C. to AAG
02/12.10.2018 Now it has been found that the petitioner's appointment
was not valid. This decision has been communicated to the petitioner.
In view of the aforesaid fact, the proceeding in this contempt case is closed, however, with liberty to the petitioner to challenge the aforesaid decision, if so advised.
(Shree Chandrashekhar, J.)
Tanuj/-
Lalita Kumari
The State of Jharkhand
Manoj Kumar
SHREE CHANDRASHEKHAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
