The High Court of Jharkhand dropped the contempt proceeding initiated against the petitioner and opposite parties, noting that the underlying legal proceedings (L.P.A. No. 123 of 2016) had been allowed. No substantive legal issues were decided.
Contempt proceeding dropped.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI
Cont. (civ.) No. 371 of 2016
Geeta Mishra ... Petitioner
CORAM :- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RATNAKER BHENGRA
For the Petitioner : Mr. Vinay Kumar, Advocate. For the O.Ps. : Mr. Mithilesh Singh, Advocate
18/30.11.2018: Heard learned counsel for opposite party Nos. 2 and 3.
It is submitted that L.P.A. No.123 of 2016 has been allowed vide
order dated 29th October, 2018.
In view of the aforesaid submission, this contempt proceeding is hereby dropped.
(Ratnaker Bhengra,J)
KNR/-
Geeta Mishra
The State of Jharkhand
Qamar Ahsan
Dr. Prasun Kumar Jha
Ratnaker Bhengra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
