Petitioner's bail application was withdrawn by counsel, permitted by the court due to a clerical error prior to execution. The single-judge bench dismissed the application as withdrawn without substantive adjudication on merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
A.B.A. No. 7336 of 2017
CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY
For the Petitioners : Mr. Pratik Sen, Advocate For the State : A.P.P.
Order No. 04 Dated 13 th March, 2018
It appears that due to clerical error vide order dated 26.02.2018, the case diary was called for from the learned court below, but the learned counsel for the petitioners had withdrawn this bail application and this fact has been reiterated by the learned counsel for the petitioners today also.
In such circumstances, the learned counsel for the petitioners is permitted to withdraw this application.
This application is dismissed as withdrawn.
(RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY, J.)
MK
Kamlesh Yadav
Prashant Kumar Mishra
Tek Narayan Sah
Narayan Yadav
The State of Jharkhand
Rongon Mukhopadhyay
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
