The High Court of Jharkhand disposed of an anticipatory bail application where the anticipatory bail had already been rejected in a previous order. A report regarding the rehabilitation of a respondent was received and kept in the record.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No.3162 of 2018
------
Versus
.... .... .... Opposite Parties
------
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
For the Petitioner : Mr. Afaque Rashidi, Advocate For the State : Addl.P.P.
Order No.06 Dated- 12.04.2019
Perusal of the record reveals that the anticipatory bail has already been rejected and a report was called for from DLSA regarding the rehabilitation of the opposite party No.2.
The said report has been received. Let the same be kept in the record.
This anticipatory bail application is treated as disposed of.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J . )
Animesh/
A.B.A. No.3162 of 2018
The State of Jharkhand
Lucky Mehta @ Rubbie Devi @ Rubbi Kumari
Anil Kumar Choudhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
