Petitioner sought permission to withdraw writ petition to pursue parentage declaration elsewhere; Court allowed withdrawal and dismissed petition as withdrawn.
Permission to withdraw the writ petition was allowed; petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (S) No. 5441 of 2015
Yogendra Nath Mahto
-----Petitioner
Versus
CORAM: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Aparesh Kumar Singh The Hon'ble Mr. Justice B.B. Mangalmurti
For the Petitioner: Mr. Shekhar Pd. Sinha, Advocate For the Resp – Railway: Mr. Vijoy Kr. Sinha, A.S.C. (Railway)
06/ 06.09.2017 Learned counsel for the petitioner, on instruction, seeks permission to
withdraw this writ application so that the petitioner may raise his grievance before the appropriate Court where such a declaration relating to his parentage can be sought for, in accordance with law. Learned counsel for the Respondent Railways is present.
( Aparesh Kumar Singh, J )
( B.B. Mangalmurti, J)
Ranjeet/
Yogendra Nath Mahto
The Union of India
Aparesh Kumar Singh
B. B. Mangalmurti
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
