Petitioner sought to withdraw the writ application. Court allowed the withdrawal and dismissed the writ petition accordingly.
Prayer to withdraw the writ application allowed; writ petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
W.P.(C). No. 4497 of 2003
M/s. Rezvi Enterprises
Versus
The Union of India & Ors.
… … … Petitioner ... … ... Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DR. S. N. PATHAK
For Petitioner :Mr. S.K. Ughal, Advocate For Respondent : None.
07/ 13.06.2017 Mr. S.K. Ughal, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner,
submits that this case has become infructuous and as such, he may be permitted to withdraw this application.
Prayer is allowed.
Accordingly, this writ application is dismissed as withdrawn.
(Dr. S.N. Pathak, J.)
kunal/punit
M/s. Rezvi Enterprises
The Union of India
Dr. S. N. Pathak
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
