In W.P. (S) No. 3672 of 2015, the petitioner failed to appear despite prior hearings. The Single Judge held the writ petition to be defective and dismissed it in default due to non-appearance.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
W. P. (S) No. 3672 of 2015
Chhotan Ram S/o Late Chando Ram r/o Diwan Khana Mohalla P.O. and P.S. Chatra, Dist. Chatra, Jharkhand
.... ..... Petitioner
Versus
.... ..... Respondents
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHREE CHANDRASHEKHAR
For the Petitioner : None For the State : JC to SC (L&C)
07/ 09 . 03.2017 After this writ petition was filed on 10.08.2015,
whenever the matter was listed either before the Joint Registrar(Judicial)/Registrar General of the Court except, on 22.02.2017 none appeared for the petitioner.
Today on the second call also, the learned counsel for
the petitioner is absent.
The writ petition has remained defective.
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed in default.
(Shree Chandrashekhar, J.)
R.K./Pankaj
Chhotan Ram S/o Late Chando Ram
The State of Jharkhand
The Registrar General, Jharkhand High Court
The District and Sessions Judge, Chatra
The Registrar, Civil Court, Chatra
Shree Chandrashekhar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
