The appeal stood dismissed for nonprosecution as the appellants failed to appear despite repeated calls. No substantive legal proposition was formulated in this one-line order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
S.A. No.21 of 2006
The State of Jharkhand & Ors.
…… Appellants
Versus
Smt. Hari Dasi …... Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAV K. GUPTA
For the Appellants : None For the Respondent : Mr. Anil Kumar, Sr. Advocate
---------
07/Dated: 20th April, 2017
On repeated calls, none appears on behalf of the appellants. Learned senior counsel for the respondent is in attendance.
2. It transpires that earlier on 21.04.2009 also none had appeared.
3. Accordingly, this appeal stands dismissed for nonprosecution.
(AMITAV K. GUPTA, J.)
Chandan/-
The State of Jharkhand & Ors.
Smt. Hari Dasi
Amitav K. Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
