The High Court of Jharkhand granted permission to withdraw the petition on the specific ground that the underlying matter had been compromised between the parties. The application was dismissed as withdrawn.
Permission to withdraw the petition was granted. Application dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Cr. Rev No. 99 of 2001 R
Abhay Kant Yadav. …..Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand. ….Opposite Party ----- Coram: HON’BLE MR JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY ----- For the Petitioner : Mr. Uday Kant Thakur, Advocate For the State : APP ----- 03/14.02.2017 Mr. Uday Kant Thakur, learned counsel for the petitioner, seeks permission to withdraw this application in view of the fact that the matter has been compromised between the parties.
Permission, as sought for, is granted. This application is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn.
(Rongon Mukhopadhyay,J)
Rakesh/
Abhay Kant Yadav
The State of Jharkhand
Rongon Mukhopadhyay
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
