Petitioners withdrew writ petitions claiming grievances were redressed during pendency. The High Court disposed of the petitions as infructuous and ordered closure of an interim application.
Writ petitions disposed of as infructuous; I.A. No. 8474/2013 closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (C) No. 6655 of 2012 with
W.P.(C) No. 7225 of 2012
Devendra Nath Sahu -------Petitioner in WPC 6655/2012 Girija Shankar Mishra ------Petitioner in WPC 7225/2012
Versus
CORAM: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Aparesh Kumar Singh
For the Petitioners: Mr. Manoj Tondon, Advocate For the Resp - State: JC to G.A. Mr. Atanu Banerjee
03/ 03.08.2016 Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that during pendency of the writ
petitions, grievances of the petitioners have been redressed. Therefore, the matter has been rendered infructuous, as per his instruction. Counsel for the Respondents are present.
In view of the prayer made, writ petitions are disposed of as infructuous. I.A.
No. 8474/2013 stands closed.
( Aparesh Kumar Singh, J )
Ranjeet/
Devendra Nath Sahu
Girija Shankar Mishra
State of Jharkhand through the Secretary, Food Civil Supplies and Consumer Affairs Department
Deputy Commissioner, Ranchi
Sub-Divisional Officer, Sadar, Ranchi
Aparesh Kumar Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
