Petitioner challenged initiation of a restoration case sale proceeding before S.A.R. Court. Court directed petitioner to raise objections directly in the S.A.R. Court pending proceeding before imparting opportunity to parties, instead of deciding on merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (C) No. 5274 of 2014
Subodh Bara -------Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Bhadwa Kisan 3. Gosai Kisan ------- Respondents
CORAM: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Aparesh Kumar Singh
For the Petitioner: Mr. Suraj Kumar, Advocate For the Resp - State: Mr. Atanu Banerjee, GA
02/ 09.08.2016 Heard counsel for the parties.
( Aparesh Kumar Singh, J )
Ranjeet/
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is permitted to raise an objection regarding a restoration case before the Sultan Ali Rau Court in the current writ petition.
What direction this Court should give instead of adjudicating the issue on merits.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Subodh Bara
The State of Jharkhand
Bhadwa Kisan
Gosai Kisan
Aparesh Kumar Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
