Permission sought for withdrawal was granted; writ petition dismissed as withdrawn. No substantive legal principles discussed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
W.P. (S) No. 3351 of 2016
Kunti Kumari, Daughter of Bhuneshwar Mahto, Resident of village Baihari, P.O Oriya, P.S. Muffasil, District Hazaribag.
... Petitioner
Vs.
1.The State of Jharkhand
2.The Deputy, Giridih, P.O., P.S. and District: Giridih.
3.The District Superintendent of Education, Giridih, P.O, P.S. & District: Giridih.
4.The Block Education Extension Officer, Bagodar, P.O and P.S. Bagodar, District Giridih. … … ... Respondents
-----CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMATH PATNAIK -----For the Petitioner : Mr. Lakhan Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondents : J.C to G.P. V
05 / Dated: 1st December, 2016 Per Pramath Patnaik, J.:
Mr. Lakhan Sharma, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, on instruction, seeks permission to withdraw this application.
Permission, as sought for, is accorded.
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
(Pramath Patnaik, J.)
Alankar/-
Kunti Kumari
State of Jharkhand
Pramath Patnaik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
