The High Court of Jharkhand allowed a writ petition challenging an order that deducted ₹4,000 per month from the salary of a compassionately appointed wife to recover dues of her deceased husband, quashing the recovery order.
Impugned order Memo No.230 dated 5.4.2007 directing salary recovery from petitioner is quashed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No.3130 of 2007
Manjula Saran ..... Petitioner
Versus
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.C. MISHRA
For the Petitioner : Mr. Mirnal Kanti Roy, Advocate For the Respondents : J.C. to G.P.III -----
(H. C. Mishra, J)
R.Kumar
2 issues framed by the court
Whether salary of a spouse given compassionate appointment can be used for recovery of dues of deceased husband.
Whether the impugned order directing salary deduction from compassionately appointed wife is legally sustainable.
Manjula Saran
The State of Jharkhand
The Secretary, Department of Corporation, State of Jharkhand, Ranchi
The Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Jharkhand, Ranchi
Joint Registrar, Co-operative Societies, South Chotanagpur Division, Ranchi
Assistant Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Ranchi Circle, Ranchi
H. C. Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
