Writ petition dismissed for default as the petitioner did not appear when the case was called. No substantive legal proposition; a one-line default order.
Writ petition dismissed for non-appearance of the petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
W.P. (T) No. 1020 of 2005
Prasad Explosive & Chemicals, Pandara, Ranchi … Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand and others …
... ... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D. N. PATEL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAV K. GUPTA
For the Petitioner: None
For the Respondents: M/s. Rajesh Shankar, G.A.
20/Dated: 10th February, 2016
Per D.N. Patel, J.
1) Neither the case is mentioned earlier nor any one appears for the petitioner when the case is called out. Counsel for the respondents is present.
2) As no body appears on behalf of the petitioner, this writ petition is
dismissed for default.
3) Interim relief, if any granted by this Court, stands vacated.
(D. N. Patel, J)
Manoj/
(Amitav K. Gupta, J)
Prasad Explosive & Chemicals, Pandara, Ranchi
The State of Jharkhand
D. N. PATEL
AMITAV K. GUPTA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
