The second appeal was disposed of as not pressed by the learned counsel for the appellant upon instruction from his client, with no substantive legal discussion provided.
The second appeal was disposed of as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI S.A. No. No.32 of 2016
Ramesh Bhatia, S/o Madan Lal Bhatia, R/o Jaridih Bazar, P.O. - Jaridih, P.S. - Gandhinagar, District – Bokaro, State - Jharkhand …… Appellant
Versus
1. Most Raesa Khatoon, W/o late Md. Siddique
2. Md. Khalid, S/o late Md. Siddique
3. Md. Ashif Ekbal, S/o late Md. Siddique, All residents of Jaridih Bazar, P.O. - Jaridih, P.S. - Gandhinagar, District – Bokaro, State - Jharkhand …... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAV K. GUPTA
For the Appellant : Mr. Pratyush Kumar, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. Mukesh Kumar, Advocate
---------
04/Dated: 05th August, 2016
Mr. Pratyush Kumar, learned counsel for the appellant, upon instruction of his client, is not pressing this second appeal,
2. In view of submission of learned counsel for the appellant, the second appeal stands disposed of, as not pressed.
(AMITAV K. GUPTA, J.)
Chandan/-
Ramesh Bhatia
Most Raesa Khatoon
Md. Khalid
Md. Ashif Ekbal
Amitav K. Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
