Appeal rendered infructuous as the impugned order of the Writ Court was already complied with in letter and spirit by the State counsel.
Appeal dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI L.P.A. No. 303 of 2010
... … Appellants
Versus
... … Respondents
For the State : Mr. Manoj Kumar, S.C. Mines Mr. Sreenu Garapati, J.C. to S.C. Mines For the Respondents :
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRENDER SINGH, CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHREE CHANDRASHEKHAR
-----
10/Dated: 11th August, 2016 Per Virender Singh, C.J.
Since the order of the Writ Court has already been complied with in its letter and spirit, the learned counsel for the State states that the instant appeal filed by the State has been rendered infructuous. Ordered accordingly.
(Virender Singh, C.J.)
(Shree Chandrashekhar, J.)
R.K. / Tanuj
State of Bihar, now Jharkhand and Others
Durgawati Devi and Others
Virender Singh, Chief Justice
Shree Chandrashekhar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
