Dismissed

Jharkhand Urja Vikas Nigam Ltd. through Its Law Officer Namely Mithlesh Kumar v. the Tata Power Company Limited Thr Its Authorized Signatory Cum Head Corporate Legal Arun Bapat And

Jharkhand HC9 Aug 2016LPA/12/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Letters Patent Appeal was admitted. The appellant sought withdrawal with liberty to file a fresh appeal. The High Court acceded to this prayer and dismissed the appeal as withdrawn.

What did the court decide?

Withdrawal of the Letters Patent Appeal allowed with liberty to file a fresh appeal.

What the court decided

Jharkhand Urja Vikas Nigam Ltd. through Its Law Officer Namely Mithlesh Kumar Vs the Tata Power Company Limited Thr Its Authorized Signatory Cum Head Corporate Legal Arun Bapat And — Jharkhand HC (2016) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

¶2

L.P.A No. 12 of 2016

¶3

Jharkhand Urja Vikas Nigam Ltd. through its Law Officer namely Mithlesh Kumar son of Sri R.B.Choudhary resident of Kusai Colony, PO & PS Doranda District Ranchi Appellant

¶4

Versus

¶5

1.The Tata Power Company Limited, a company registered under the Indian Companies Act, 1956 having its registered office at Bombay House – 24, Homi Mody Street, Mumbai – 400001, through its Authorized Signatory-cum-Head Corporate Legal, namely Arun Bapat son of late S.V.Bapat, resident of 403, Vijay Tower, Bhaskar Colony, Naupada Thane (West) PO & PS Thane (West) District Thane (Maharashtra) - 400602 2.Tata Power Jamshedpur Distribution Limited (earlier known as TP Power Distribution Limited) a company registered under the Indian Companies Act, 1956 having its registered office at C/o The Tata Power Company Limited, Corporate Centre, A-Block, 34-Sant Tukaram Road, Carnac Bunder, Mumbai-400009, through its Authorized Signatory-cum-Head Corporate Legal, namely, Vivek Singla son of late S.C.Singla, resident of D-12/3, Model Town, PO Model Town, PS Model Town, District Delhi – 110009

¶6

3.Jharkhand Bijli Vitaran Nigam Ltd.(a distribution company) through its Managing Director having his office at Engineering Building, H.E.C, Dhurwa PO & PS Dhurwa, District Ranchi 4.Chief Engineer (C & R), Jharkhand Bijli Vitaran Nigam Ltd., having his office at Engineering Building, H.E.C, Dhurwa PO & PS Dhurwa, District Ranchi

¶7

Respondents

¶8

Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Virender Singh, Chief Justice Hon'ble Mr. Justice Shree Chandrashekhar

¶9

For the Petitioners/Appellant : M/s.Ajit Kumar, Senior Advocate, Navin Kumar, M.K.Sinha, K.Sundaram, Advocate For the Respondent Nos.1-2 : M/s.Sumeet Gadodia, Shilpi John, Advocate

¶10

Dated : 9th August, 2016 Per Virender Singh, C.J. :

¶11

Mr.Ajit Kumar, while facing with certain inherent defects pointed out by the Bench, made a statement at the Bar that he may be allowed to withdraw the instant Letters Patent Appeal with a liberty to file a fresh one.

¶12

Prayer made at the Bar is acceded to.

¶13

The instant Letters Patent Appeal stands dismissed as

¶14

withdrawn with the liberty aforesaid.

¶15

(Virender Singh, C.J.)

¶16

(Shree Chandrashekhar,J.)

¶17

dey

Jharkhand Urja Vikas Nigam Ltd. through Its Law Officer Namely Mithlesh Kumar v. the Tata Power Company Limited Thr Its Authorized Signatory Cum Head Corporate Legal Arun Bapat And

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Jharkhand Urja Vikas Nigam Ltd. through Its Law Officer Namely Mithlesh Kumar v. the Tata Power Company Limited Thr Its Authorized Signatory Cum Head Corporate Legal Arun Bapat And

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

The State of Jharkhand and Ors. Vs Binod Kindo

Rajesh Gupta Vs Union of India through the Secretary Ministry of Home Affairs and Ors.

Shambhu Nath Pal Vs the State of Jharkhand and Ors. `

Jharkhand Urja Vikas Nigam Ltd. through Its Law Officer Namely Mithlesh Kumar Vs Ranchi Power Distribution Company Ltd. and Ors.

State of Jharkhand Vs Manik Chand Ravidas

M/S Heavy Engineering Corporation Limited Vs Their Workmen