Smt.Chhabi Basu v. Uma Sen And Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
The appeal was dismissed due to non-prosecution as the appellant failed to appear on multiple occasions despite repeated calls.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
F.A. No. 65 of 1999(R)
Smt. Chhabi Basu …… Appellant Versus Uma Sen and Others …… Respondents
…… Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAV K. GUPTA
For the Appellant : None For the Respondent No.2 : Mr. S.K. Laik, Advocate
06/Dated: 14/01/2016
Nobody appears on behalf of the appellant on repeated calls. Learned counsel for the respondent is present.
It transpires from the record that steps have not been taken against the respondent No. 1(a) and on the last date i.e. on 15.06.2015 none had appeared on behalf of the appellant despite repeated calls.
Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
(Amitav K. Gupta, J.)
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Smt. Chhabi Basu
- respondent
Uma Sen and Others
Coram
Amitav K. Gupta
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Jharkhand HC
- Decided on
- · January
- Registered
- Case no.
- FA/65/1999
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court