sentenced to undergo R.I. under Sections 324/149 IPC for six months and under Section 148 IPC for three months. All the sentences were directed to run concurrently. Hence, this appeal. 7. PW-2 is Sarthi Kr. Pradhan (Informant). He is one of the injured eye-witness. He has deposed that on 10-9-90 at about 8.30 p.m. he along with Kritibas Pradhan, Santanu Pradhan and Sasank Pradhan had gone to respond natural call and as they reached near pond, they saw that three persons were catching fish from the pond and On challenging the three persons, they started running away, but they were able to catch hold one Trilochan @ Gudru. On inquiry, he confessed his guilt and told that he along with accused Gobind Naik and Baisakhu Naik were fishing and seeing them other two accused persons were fleeing away. Thereafter, accused Trilochan @ Gudru was taken to the house of Ramchandra Pradhan where he was kept confined during the night. In the next morning that is on 11-9-90 at about 4 p.m. other accused came to the house of Ramchandra Pradhan (PW-1) and they took away Trilochan Naik @ Gudru Naik and the fishing net along with them. He has further deposed in para-2 of his deposition that appellant- Trilochan, assaulted them with Lathi and that appellant-Mukhi shot arrow, but it did not hit him. Appellant- Govind gave Tangi blow to Kirtibas Pradhan and he had fled away. He has further deposed that Kritibas Pradhan, Sashank Pradhan and Santanu Pradhan had fallen down in a injured condition. In para-5, he has further deposed that the appellantGovind had given Tangi blow on Kirtibas Pradhan. 8. PW-3 is Sashank Pradhan. He is an injured eye-witness as well as nephew of the informant. He has also supported the evidence of PW-2. In para-1 of his deposition, he has deposed that accusedappellants were armed with weapon restrained them in the way and assaulted them and that they were injured. Kritibas Pradhan sustained head injury and Santanu Pradhan sustained injury in hand.
