Shambhu Nath Agrawal And Anr. v. State of Jharkhand And Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.M.P. No. 35…
What did the court decide?
Permission to withdraw application was accorded.
COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.M.P. No. 35…
Permission to withdraw application was accorded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Cr.M.P. No. 35 of 2009
… … Petitioners
Versus
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY
For the Petitioners : Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Advocate For the Opp. Parties : A.P.P.
02/15.06.2016 Mr. Sanjay Kumar, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, seeks permission to withdraw this application.
Permission is accorded.
This application is dismissed as withdrawn.
(R. Mukhopadhyay, J.)
Umesh/-
Shambhu Nath Agarwal
Ramjee Lal Agarwal
The State of Jharkhand
Lusi Robert
Rongon Mukhopadhyay
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court