Anand Kishore Sharma v. the State of Jharkhand and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
In an absent petitioner contempt application under W.P.(S) No. 214 of 2015, the court observed that the legally payable arrears towards leave encashment, gratuity, and pension were paid by the State. Consequently, no willful disobedience of the previous order existed, and the application was dismissed.
What did the court decide?
The contempt application was dismissed as there was no willful disobedience by the respondents.