Petitioner filed a contempt application for non-compliance of a prior writ order. The Bench found that the requisite compliance was eventually accomplished, albeit belatedly. Consequently, the contempt application was dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Cont. Case (Civil) No. 21 of 2016
Munishwar Prasad Sinha “Nirala” … … … Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand and another … ... ... Opp. Parties
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D. N. PATEL
For the Petitioner: M/s. Madan Mohan Pan, K.N. Sahay For the Opp. Parties: M/s. LCN Shahdeo, G.P.-IV
03/Dated: 16th June, 2016
Per D.N. Patel, J.
1) Learned counsels for both sides submitted that the order dated 3rd February, 2015 passed in W.P. (S) No.83 of 2014, for non-compliance of which this contempt application has been preferred, has now been complied with at a belated stage.
2) In view of the aforesaid submission, this contempt application is dismissed.
Manoj/
Munishwar Prasad Sinha Nirala
The State of Jharkhand
D.N. Patel
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
