The High Court of Jharkhand, in a contempt proceeding, noted that the impugned order had been complied with. The court dismissed the petition and dropped the case.
Contempt petitions dropped and disposed of with liberty to approach appropriate forum for remaining grievances.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cont. Case (Civil) No. 155 of 2016
Satyendra Ray, S/o Late Ram Brichh Ray, Resident of Village- Deokali, POBahadurpur (Deokali), PS- Sukhpura, Dist- Balia (U.P). ... Petitioner
-Versus-
1.The State of Jharkhand
… ... Opposite Parties
CORAM :- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RATNAKER BHENGRA
... For the Petitioner :- Mr. Someshwar Roy, Advocate. For the State :- Mr. L.C.N. Shahdeo, GP-IV For the MADA : M/s. Bhawesh Kumar & Ravi Kumar, Advocates.
07/12.08.2016: Heard both sides.
Learned counsel for the applicant has said that the order has been complied with.
Accordingly, this contempt case is dropped and disposed of with liberty to the petitioner that if he has any remaining grievance he may approach the appropriate forum.
(Ratnaker Bhengra, J.)
S.B.
Satyendra Ray
State of Jharkhand
Sri Anil Kumar Pandey
Ratnaker Bhengra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
