The High Court rejected the bail application of the petitioner accused of attempted rape under Section 354(B) IPC concerning a deaf, dumb, and mentally challenged victim, citing serious allegations and the case diary.
Prayer for grant of bail rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No. 5632 of 2016
Bablu Bouri … … Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand
... ... Opposite Party
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANDA SEN
For the Petitioners : Mr.Arun Kumar, Advocate For the State : A.P.P 02/Dated: 17th August, 2016
(Ananda Sen, J.)
Amar
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to bail in a case of attempted rape upon a mentally challenged victim.
Whether the informant's hearsay statement affects the grant of bail.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Bablu Bouri
The State of Jharkhand
Ananda Sen
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
