Wakil Ram v. The State Of Jharkhand
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner, accused in an Arms Act investigation, was directed to be enlarged on bail after named accused received bail.
What did the court decide?
Petitioner directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing a bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A. No. 5383 of 2016
Wakil Ram
.… Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand .... Opposite Party
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAV K. GUPTA
For the Petitioner : Mr. P.K.Choudhary, Adv. For the Opposite Party : A.P.P. ----------
02/Dated:13.07.2016
The petitioner has been made accused for the offence registered under Sections 25(1-b)a/26/35 of Arms Act
Heard Learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. and the petitioner has been made an accused in course of investigation. That no incriminating article was recovered from the possession of the petitioner. It is further submitted that the named accused, namely, Shankar Karmali, Naushad Ansari @ Nasir Ansari @ Nasir and Prem Ram have been granted bail in B.A. Nos. 1106/16, 184/16, 198/16 respectively by a Bench of this Court. That the case of the petitioner stands on better footing.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Wakil Ram
- respondent
State of Jharkhand
Coram
Amitav K. Gupta
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Jharkhand HC
- Decided on
- · July
- Registered
- Case no.
- B.A./5383/2016
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court