The court held that Civil MiscellaneousPetition No. 357 of 2014 became infructuous because the identical prayer was already sought in another petition, C.M.P. No. 463 of 2016, and thereby dismissed the former as duplicative.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
C.M.P. No. 357 of 2014
The Director General, Vigilance Bureau & Anr.........….... Petitioners
Versus
The State of Jharkhand & Ors ………… Opposite Parties
Coram: Hon’ble the Acting Chief Justice Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ananda Sen
For the Petitioners : Mr. Vikash Kumar, JC to AAG For the Opposite Parties :
Order No. 10 /Dated : 11th November, 2016
Learned counsel for the appellant submits that he has already filed another Civil Miscellaneous Petition i.e. C.M.P. No. 463 of 2016, for the same relief.
Since the same prayer has been made in both the applications, this Civil Miscellaneous Petition bearing C.M.P. No. 357 of 2014 has become infructuous.
Accordingly, it is dismissed as infructuous.
(Pradip Kumar Mohanty, ACJ)
(Ananda Sen, J)
MukundAmar/
1 issue framed by the court
Whether C.M.P. No. 357 of 2014 should be dismissed as infructuous due to duplicative relief sought in C.M.P. No. 463 of 2016.
The Director General, Vigilance Bureau & Anr.
The State of Jharkhand & Ors
Ananda Sen
Pradip Kumar Mohanty
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
