Petitioner submitted that the writ application has become infructuous. The High Court dismissed the writ petition on that ground.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
W.P.(C) No. 5940 of 2012
M/s S.M. Process Plant(P) Ltd., having its works Marar, PO & PS-Marar, Dist. Ramgarh, through one of its Director Anand Kumar Shraff, S/o Late Shivnath Shraff, R/o Goribagh, PO & PSRamgarh, Dist.- Ramgarh
... ... Petitioner
Versus
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR ------ For the Petitioner: Mrs. Sweta Rani, Adv. For the Respondents: Mr. Rahul Kumar,SC,(JUVNL)
4/13.05.2015
It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that
this application has become infructuous, thus, she is not pressing the same.
Accordingly, this writ application is dismissed.
(Prashant Kumar, J.)
Sunil/-
M/s S.M. Process Plant(P) Ltd.
Jharkhand State Electricity Board
The Chairman, JSEB
The General Manager cum Chief Engineer, Electrical Supply Area, Hazaribagh
The Electrical Superintending Engineer, Electrical Supply Circle, Hazaribagh
The Electrical Executive Engineer (Commercial & Revenue)
Prashant Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
