The writ petition filed by the petitioners was dismissed as infructuous on the ground that a title suit instituted by them had been decreed in their favour and their names had been mutated in the revenue record based on that decree.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No. 5074 of 2004
Philmon Oraon @ Philmon Tigga & Others
… … … Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand & Others ... … ... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHREE CHANDRASHEKHAR
For the Petitioners: Mr. Rajiv Anand For the Respondents: Mr. J.C to S.C(L&C)
11/09.09.2015 The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that Title Suit No. 25/04 instituted by the petitioners has been decreed in their favour and thus, the present writ petition has become infructuous.
The learned counsel further submits that on the basis of the judgment and order passed in Title Suit No. 25/04, the names of the petitioners have been mutated in the revenue record.
The judgment and order passed in Title Suit No. 25/04 is taken on record.
Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
(Shree Chandrashekhar, J)
Satish
Philmon Oraon @ Philmon Tigga & Others
The State of Jharkhand
Shree Chandrashekhar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
