The petitioner sought permission to withdraw the writ petition. The High Court allowed the prayer for withdrawal and dismissed the writ application as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
W.P. (S) No. 3325 of 2010
Nakul Ravidas, S/o Late Harihar Ravidas, R/o-Village-Korka, P.O-Korka, P.S-Pathargama, District-Godda …… Petitioner
Versus
1.The State of Jharkhand
---------
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMATH PATNAIK
---------- For the Petitioner : Mr. P.K. Verma, Adv. For the Respondents : M/s S.C-III
-----------
9/Dated:01st May, 2015 Per Pramath Patnaik, J:
Learned counsel for the petitioner upon instruction from his client seeks permission to withdraw this writ application.
Prayer is allowed.
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed, as withdrawn.
Saket/-
(Pramath Patnaik, J.)
Nakul Ravidas
State of Jharkhand
Accountant General, Government of Jharkhand
Superintending Engineer Irrigation Mechanical Circle
Sub Divisional Officer, Irrigation Mechanical Sub Division
Executive Engineer, Mechanical Division of Irrigation
Pramath Patnaik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
