Single judge disposal of miscellaneous admission petitions regarding validity of notice by paper publication in civil disputes involving insurance claim.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
M.A. No. 219 of 2009
Anil Kumar Verma, son of late Jagdambu Sahay, resident of Mohan Bazar, Bhatdhih, (Pathardih), P.S. Jorapokhar (Sudamdih), P.O. Pathardih, District Dhanbad, presently residing at village and P.O. Chandhari, P.S. Islampur, District Nalanda (Bihar) ………..Appellant
Versus
With
M.A. No. 228 of 2009
M/S National Insurance Company Limited, having its Divisional Office at B.P. Agarwall’s Building (1st Floor), P.O. and P.S. Dhansar, District Dhanbad, represented through its legal cell, S.N. Ganguli Road, Ranchi, District Ranchi
……Appellant
Versus
---------
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAV K. GUPTA
----------
For the Appellant : Mr. M.B. Lal, Advocate (in M.A. no. 219 of 2009) For the Respondent : For the appellant :Mr. Manish Kumar, Advocate (in M.A. no. 228 of 2009) For the Respondents : Mr. M.B. Lal, Advocate (in M.A. no. 228 of 2009)
---------
12/Dated:15th June, 2015
Learned counsel for the appellant has submitted that pursuant
to the order passed in I.A. no. 3778 of 2014, the paper publication has been made and to this effect, supplementary affidavit along with photo copy of paper cutting showing issuance of notice by way of paper publication has been filed.
Notice issued in compliance with the Court’s order is deemed to be valid and awaiting appearance of respondent no. 2, put up this case on 7th July, 2015.
(Amitav K. Gupta, J.)
Tarun/-
Anil Kumar Verma
Terence Philips
National Insurance Company Limited
M/S National Insurance Company Limited
Amitav K. Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
