Pappu Yadav And Anr. v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
In Cr.App.(D.B) No.300 of 1998, the Court noted that appellants had been in custody for over 17 years and directed the office to verify their custodial status before listing the matter with precedence.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
In the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi
Cr.App.(D.B) No.300 of 1998(P)
- Pappu Yadav
- Sanjay Yadav........... .........................Appellants
V E R S U S
State of Bihar now Jharkhand..................Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. R. PRASAD HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAV K. GUPTA
For the Appellants: Mr. Mahesh Kumar Sinha For the State : A.P.P
11 / 03.9.14. It was submitted that the appellants have been in custody since last more than 17 years and therefore, this case should have been listed at the top as in other matters which have been listed for hearing, the appellant may not be in custody since more than 17 years.
The office is directed to find it out and if the appellants are in custody, it should be listed along with Cr. App. (D.B.) No.167 of 1998(P) under the heading for hearing as per seriatum of the age of the custody of the appellants.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether appellants in custody for over 17 years should be listed at the top for hearing.
Whether the appellants remain in custody as claimed.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
1. Pappu Yadav 2. Sanjay Yadav
- respondent
State of Bihar now Jharkhand
Coram
R. R. Prasad
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Jharkhand HC
- Decided on
- · February
- Registered
- Case no.
- Cr.A(DB)/9900300/1998
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court