Mr. Anil Kumar, learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that warrant of arrest has been issued against the petitioner, on the basis of the requisition submitted by the I.O. before the court below, stating therein that the petitioner has been evading arrest, but from the service report submitted by the S.I. Dorana Police Station, it would appear that the address on which warrant of arrest was issued, the petitioner was not living, rather according to report, the petitioner was living at his work place but subsequent to that, the I.O. submitted a requisition stating therein that the petitioner has been evading arrest, which opinion was formed as according to I.O. when he raided the house of the petitioner, the petitioner was not found present. When the petitioner was not living on the address, as has been found by the S.I. Doranda Police Station, how the petitioner would be found present, when the raid was laid by the Vigilance Police and, thereby, any statement made in the requisition that the petitioner was evading arrest is incorrect and hence, the order of issuance of warrant of arrest and consequently issuance of process under Section 82 Cr.P.C. are illegal.
