A contempt petition was dismissed for lack of willful disobedience, noting that opposite parties had passed the impugned order before the earlier court directive.
Liberty reserved to challenge the order passed by the opposite parties before the appropriate forum.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Cont. Case (Civil) No. 1070 of 2012
Purushottam Mishra, S/o Late Ram Nagina Mishra, resident of Jagavir P.O. & P.S. Bhatpar Rani District-Deoria (U.P.) presently residing at Officer's flat no. 1, State Transport Campus, Near Over bridge, P.O. & P.S. Chutia, District-Ranchi.
…. Petitioner
Versus
1. State of Jharkhand
….. Opposite Parties
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE D.N. PATEL
For the Petitioner : Mr. Ajay Kr Pathak, Advocate For the State : J.C. to A.A.G.
02/Dated: 7th December, 2015
(D.N. Patel, J.)
VK/
Purushottam Mishra
State of Jharkhand
Sri K. Khandwal
D.N. Patel
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
