Permission to withdraw criminal revision application by the petitioner was granted, resulting in disposal of the matter as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Cr. Rev. No. 1135 of 2013 Sandeep Mahto … Petitioner (s) Versus The State of Jharkhand ... Opposite Party --CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE P. P. BHATT --For the Petitioner (s) : M/s. G. Priyadershi & Pushpa Kumari For the Opposite Party : APP --- Order No. 5 Dated 4th August, 2014
Learned counsel for the petitioner upon instruction received from her client seeks permission to withdraw this criminal revision application.
Permission as sought for is hereby granted. Accordingly, this criminal application stands disposed of as
withdrawn.
( P. P. Bhatt, J .)
MK
Sandeep Mahto
The State of Jharkhand
P. P. Bhatt
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
