The Single Judge allowed the Criminal Miscellaneous Petition for restoration of a Bahis dismissing the petition for non-prosecution after the petitioner showed sufficient reason for his absence.
Restoration of B.A. No. 10285 of 2012 to its original position.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.M.P. No. 962 of 2013
Sunil Das ... ... … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand ... ... ... Opposite Party
CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE JAYA ROY
For the Petitioner : Mr. Pran Pranay, Advocate For the State : A. P. P.
03/01.05.2013
Petitioner has filed this Cr.M.P application for restoration of B. A. No. 10285 of 2012 which was dismissed for non-prosecution by this Court vide order dated 10.04.2013.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has shown the sufficient reason for his non-appearance in the aforesaid case on 10.04.2013, the Cr.M.P. No. 962 of 2013 is allowed and B.A. No. 10285 of 2012 is restored to its original position.
( Jaya Roy, J .)
Satayendra
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Bahis proceeding for non-prosecution should be restored to its original position?
Sunil Das
The State of Jharkhand
Jaya Roy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
