The application filed by the petitioners was disconnected and dismissed on the grounds of withdrawal, with liberty to raise the points at an appropriate stage.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI
Cr. M. P. No. 2690 of 2012
1.Rukmani Devi 2.Dharmendra Kumar @ Dharmendra Kumar Singh 3.Dilip Singh @ Dilip Kumar Singh ..... Petitioner(s) Versus 1.The State of Jharkhand 2. Rita Devi …. Opp. Party(s) CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE R. R. PRASAD
For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Shekhar Pd. Sinha, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Arun Kumar Pandey, A.P.P. -----
03 /06.03.2013. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners seeks permission
to withdraw this application.
Permission is accorded.
Accordingly, this application is dismissed, as withdrawn.
However, the petitioners would be at liberty to raise all the points
which have been raised in this application at an appropriate stage.
Sandeep/
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
