Petitioner sought withdrawal of writ petition due to missing annexures. Court dismissed the petition with liberty to file a fresh petition.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file fresh.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Sr. No. 20
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
WP (Crl) No. 91/2026
Rajesh Karlopia
…. Petitioner/Appellant(s)
Through:Mr. Sumit Nayyar, Advocate
V/s
State of Punjab and others
…..Respondent(s)
Through:-
CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE SINDHU SHARMA, JUDGE
ORDER
14.09.2026
(SINDHU SHARMA) JUDGE
Jammu:
14.09.2026
V ishal K hajuria
Rajesh Karlopia
State of Punjab
Sindhru Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
