Writ petition dismissed for non-prosecution after the petitioner failed to appear on consecutive hearing dates. Interim directions, if any, were vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
S. No.43 Regular list
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
WP(C)/928/2024 CM/2502/2024
BASHIR AHMAD SOFI
Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: None.
Vs.
UNION TERRITORY OF J & K & OTHERS ...Respondent(s)
Through: Ms. Nadia Abdullah, Assisting counsel.
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MA CHOWDHARY, JUDGE ORDER 15.09.2026
There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. So was the case
on previous date of hearing as well, which suggests that the petitioner has lost interest to prosecute this petition any further. The petition is thus dismissed for non-prosecution along with connected CM(s). Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated.
(MA CHOWDHARY) JUDGE
SRINAGAR
15.09.2026
“Hilal”
BASHIR AHMAD SOFI
UNION TERRITORY OF J & K & OTHERS
MA CHOWDHARY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
