The writ petition was dismissed for non-prosecution after the petitioner failed to appear on three consecutive hearing dates, including 15.09.2026. The court held that the petitioner had lost interest in pursuing the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
S. No.22 Regular list
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
WP(C)/898/2021 CM/2837/2021
AMIR NAZIR DAR
Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: None.
Vs.
UNION TERRITORY OF J & K & OTHERS
...Respondent(s)
Through: Ms. Nadia Abdullah, Advocate vice Mr. Hakim Aman Ali, Dy. AG .
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MA CHOWDHARY, JUDGE ORDER
15.09.2026
There is no representation on behalf of the petition. So was the case on previous two dates as well, which indicates that the petitioner has lost interest to prosecute this petition any further. The petition is thus, dismissed , along with connected application(s). Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated.
(MA CHOWDHARY) JUDGE
SRINAGAR
15.09.2026
“Hilal”
AMIR NAZIR DAR
UNION TERRITORY OF J & K & OTHERS
MA CHOWDHARY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
