Petition dismissed for non-prosecution as petitioners failed to appear on the last hearing date and did not turn up today to pursue the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Sr. No. 43
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
WP (C) No. 877/2026
Abdul Ali and Others
.....Applicant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through :- None
v/s
UT of J&K and Others
.....Respondent(s)
Through :- Mr. Vishal Sharma, DSGI with Mr. Sumant Sudan, Advocate Ms. Arsha Sharma, Advocate
CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE MOKSHA KHAJURIA KAZMI, JUDGE
ORDER 08.09.2026
On the last date of hearing, there was no representation on behalf of
the petitioners. Today also, when the case was taken up, nobody turned up to appear for the petitioners. It seems that the petitioners are no more interested to pursue this petition.
This petition is, accordingly, dismissed for non-prosecution.
(Moksha Khajuria Kazmi) Judge
JAMMU 08.09.2026 Manik
Abdul Ali and Others
UT of J&K and Others
Moksha Khajuria Kazmi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
