The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir dismissed a writ petition for non-prosecution by the petitioner, who showed a loss of interest in prosecuting the case. Interim directions were vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
98
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
WP(C) No. 789/2022
Saran Singh & Anr.
…..Petitioner(s)/Applicant(s)
Through: None.
vs
UT of J&K & Ors.
.….Respondent(s)
Through: Ms. Shagun Singh, Advocate vice Mr. Ankur Sharma, Advocate.
CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE MOKSHA KHAJURIA KAZMI, JUDGE
ORDER
08.09.2026
01. None for the petitioners. Same was the position on last date of hearing. It appears that petitioners have lost interest in prosecuting the present petition. Hence, present petition is dismissed for non-prosecution along with connected application(s), if any.
02. Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated.
(Moksha Khajuria Kazmi)
Judge
Jammu
08.09.2026 A binash
Saran Singh & Anr.
UT of J&K & Ors.
Moksha Khajuria Kazmi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
