The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh dismissed Writ Petition (C) No. 640/2022 in default due to the petitioners' non-appearance and failure to appear on subsequent hearing dates, indicating a loss of interest.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Sr. No. 37
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
WP(C) No. 640/2022
S. Gurcharan Singh & Anr.
…. Petitioner/Appellant(s)
Through:- None.
V/s
UT of J&K and others
…..Respondent(s)
Through:- Mr. Vivek Mattoo, Advocate vice Mr. Vishal Bharti, Dy. AG.
CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE SINDHU SHARMA, JUDGE ORDER
14.09.2026
There was no representation on behalf of the petitioners on the last two consecutive dates of hearing, i.e., 12.07.2024 and 04.12.2024. Today
also, when the matter was taken up, no one appeared on behalf of the petitioners. It is thus evident that the petitioners have lost interest in pursuing the present writ petition.
Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed in default of appearance and for non-prosecution.
(Sindhu Sharma) Judge
Jammu:
14.09.2026 Michal Sharma/PS
S. Gurcharan Singh & Anr.
UT of J&K and others
Sindhu Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
