Petitioner withdrew the writ petition. The High Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn and vacated any interim direction that may have been in place.
Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn; interim direction vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
S. No. 81-VI Regular Cause List
IN THE HIGH COURT 0F JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
WP(C) No. 583/2023 CM No. 2398/2023
BAGA BEGUM
…Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: Mr. Q. R. Shamus, Advocate
Vs.
UT of JK and others
...Respondent(s)
Through: None
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PARIHAR, JUDGE
ORDER 01.09.2026
1. This case has been segregated from other connected
matters.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he does not want to pursue this matter and seeks withdrawal of the
3. In view of the statement so made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition WP(C) No. 583/2023 is dismissed as withdrawn along with connected CM.
4. Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated.
(SANJAY PARIHAR)
JUDGE
Srinagar
01.09.2026 “Imtiyaz”
Imtiyaz Ul Gani I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
01.09.2026 17:11
BAGA BEGUM
UT of JK
SANJAY PARIHAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
