The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir dismissed the application for non-prosecution as the applicant failed to appear on the hearing dates.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Sr. No. 14
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
WP (C) No. 477/2022
Mohd. Khalid
.....Applicant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through :- None
v/s
Custodian Evecuee Property Jammu and Others
.....Respondent(s)
Through :- Mr. Vishal Bharti, Dy. AG Ms. Chetna Manhas, Assisting counsel to Ms. Monika Kohli, Sr. AAG
CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE MOKSHA KHAJURIA KAZMI, JUDGE
ORDER 01.09.2026
On the last date of hearing, i.e., 22.08.2026, there was no
representation on behalf of the petitioner. Today also, when the case was taken up, nobody turned up to appear for the petitioner. It seems that the petitioner is no more interested to pursue this petition. This petition is, accordingly, dismissed for non-prosecution.
(Moksha Khajuria Kazmi) Judge
JAMMU 01.09.2026 Manik
Mohd. Khalid
Custodian Evacuee Property Jammu and Others
Moksha Khajuria Kazmi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
