Petitioner stated grievance was redressed by respondents. Writ petition dismissed as not pressed.
Petition dismissed as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Sr. No. 22
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
WP(C) No. 368/2023 CM No. 914/2023
Mohd. Shafi S/O Abdul Kabir R/O Mast Garh, Jammu
.....Applicant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through :- Mr. RKS Thakur, Advocate.
v/s
Through :- Mr. Rahul Parihar, Advocate vice Mr. Sachin Dogra, Advocate.
CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE MOKSHA KHAJURIA KAZMI, JUDGE
ORDER 01.09.2026
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner states that the
grievance of the petitioner has been redressed by the respondents, as such, he does not want to press the instant petition.
The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed as not pressed.
(Moksha Khajuria Kazmi) Judge
JAMMU 01.09.2026 Raj Kumar
Raj Kumar 2026.09.02 13:47 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Mohd. Shafi
Jammu Development Authority
Moksha Khajuria Kazmi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
