The High Court of Jammu and Kashmir dismissed Writ Petition No. 3393/2023 for want of prosecution as the petitioner failed to appear or be represented in consecutive hearings.
Writ petition dismissed for want of prosecution; connected CMs dismissed; interim direction, if any, vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
S. No. 46 Regular
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
WP(C) No. 3393/2023 CM No. (8186/2023)
Ashiq Hussain Yatoo …Petitioner/Appellant(s)
Through: None
Vs.
Union Territory of J&K And Ors.
...Respondent(s)
Through: Ms. Amtul Basit Deva, Panel Lawyer HCLSA
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PARIHAR, JUDGE ORDER
07.09.2026
(SANJAY PARIHAR) JUDGE
SRINAGAR:
07.09.2026 Akhil Dev
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition can be dismissed for lack of appearance by the petitioner.
Ashiq Hussain Yatoo
Union Territory of J&K And Ors.
Sanjay Parihar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
