Single-judge order disposing a withdrawn writ petition. The court dismissed the petition as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh case, per the petitioners' counsel.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh case.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
S. No. 173 Suppl Cause List-1
IN THE HIGH COURT 0F JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
CM(5860/2026) IN WP(C) 3031/2025
HAZIM RASHID
…Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: Mr. Saqib Amin Parray, Advocate
Vs.
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS
...Respondent(s)
Through: Ms. Syed Hamidun Nisa, Advocate vice Mr. T. M. Shamsi, Sr. Advocate, DSGI
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PARIHAR, JUDGE
ORDER 08.09.2026
1. Counsel for the petitioners seeks withdrawal of this petition with
2. In view of the statement so made, the writ petition bearing WP(C) No. 3031/2025 is dismissed as withdrawn along with connected CM(s) with liberty to file a fresh if need arises.
3. CM is disposed of.
(SANJAY PARIHAR)
JUDGE
Srinagar 08.09.2026 “Imtiyaz”
Imtiyaz Ul Gani I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
08.09.2026 16:44
HAZIM RASHID
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS
SANJAY PARIHAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
