This order on a writ petition held that after conceding the petition was defective for omission of a necessary party, the petitioner was granted liberty to file a fresh petition, and the current petition was dismissed as not pressed.
Liberty granted to file a fresh petition; interim direction vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
S. No. 45 Regular
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
WP(C) No. 3018/2023 CM No. (7202/2023)
Mst. Mukti And Anr.
…Petitioner/Appellant(s)
Through: Mr. Ahmad Javaid, Advocate Ms. Hena Lone, Advocate
Vs.
Union Territory of J&K And Ors.
...Respondent(s)
Through: Mr. N. A. Kuchay, Advocate Ms. Yasmin Jan, Advocate vice Mr. T. M. Shamsi, DSGI
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PARIHAR, JUDGE
ORDER
07.09.2026
file fresh one in case need arise.
(SANJAY PARIHAR) JUDGE
SRINAGAR: 07.09.2026 Akhil Dev
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition should be dismissed as not pressed and granted liberty to file a fresh petition after necessary party omission
Mst. Mukti And Anr.
Union Territory of J&K And Ors.
Sanjay Parihar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
