The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir disposed of the petition as infructuous since the petitioner had promoted the respondent to Assistant Estates Officer during its pendency, which was acknowledged by counsel for both sides.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Serial No. 75
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
WP (C) No. 2816/2026 CM No. 6203/2026 CAV No. 2072/2026
UT of J&K
…..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: Ms. Monika Kohli, Sr. AAG with Ms. Priyanka Bhat, Advocate
vs
Ajay Parshad Sharma
.…Respondent(s)
Through: Mr. M.Y. Akhoon, Advocate
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR, JUDGE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SHAHZAD AZEEM, JUDGE
ORDER (16.09.2026)
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner states at Bar that during pendency of this petition, the petitioners have considered the case of the respondent and pursuant to the recommendations made by the DPC, promoted him to the post of Assistant Estates Officer.
The learned counsel appearing for the respondent also acknowledges the aforesaid fact and submits that his client is satisfied with the promotion.
In view, of the fair statements made by learned counsel for both sides, this petition has been rendered infructuous and is, accordingly, disposed of , as such.
(SHAHZAD AZEEM) (SANJEEV KUMAR)
JUDGE JUDGE
Jammu
16.09.2026 Sapna
UT of J&K
Ajay Parshad Sharma
Sanjeev Kumar
Shahzad Azeem
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
